Was that Submission or just a Rollicking Good Ride?
By Sensuous Sadie
SensuousSadie@aol.com 
www.sensuoussadie.com 

A while back I was relaxing after a sexy scene with a Dominant and an odd thought came to me: "had I actually submitted or was that just a rollicking good ride?" From the outside our little tête-à-tête had all the trappings of a kinky go-round. He’d tied me to the doorframe with a hood attached securely from the top and other metal hardware hooked here and there. Over the evening he’d entertained the most sensitive parts of my body with a delicate piece of ginger along with other tasty vegetables. In between these edible forays I felt the sweet sting of favored implements from his goodie closet. Fortunately I was gagged because my sighs could surely have been heard in the next county.

Yes, I enjoyed every minute of it. The tight lift of my head held so that I couldn’t look down to see what might come next. The narrow hood view of a surreal livingroom in the flickering candle flame. The soft whistle of my breath through the breathing ball gag. Something cold and tight on my nipples. His voice murmuring in my ear. Things that tingled, tickled, or tortured sweetly on my openness down under.

As wonderful as that all was, I have some trouble thinking of it as "submission" because really, I loved it all. I would do it again if he were here right now. So then, the real question for me is – "what is submission really?" Well, let’s pull back a little bit and I’ll describe my relationship with Lucas a bit so you have the bigger picture. I’d been with Lucas for about a year, on and off. I think of him as a Top, not so much a Dominant per se, because we did our scenes for a few hours on a weekend evening and that’s about the extent of our BDSM thang. The rest of the time we had a pretty egalitarian relationship in the sense that he treated me as he might any other dear friend or lover. Despite this, Master Lucas defines himself as a Dominant, and I’ll address that little tangent a little bit later.

Now I’ll admit that I’ve been struggling with these ideas, because it can all seem a bit of a puzzle. But after some thought, I’ve come to believe that many of the scenes we did not involve submission on my part. You see, I feel that submitting has some basic components that were not present, even though they might have appeared so on the outside. For me, submitting has to do not just with having a spicy hot time (which I was having) but in surrendering to someone else’s will. Even though I was chained to the doorway – which appears to be yielding to his will – to me, that is only the most superficial level. I feel the need to cleave deeply to his desires and his needs, and to be pushed beyond my comfort level in some aspect, be it emotional or physical. My dear friend Stacey gets this quite well, when she says, "Submission isn’t so much about surrendering your body, it’s about surrendering your mind, although the body often goes along for the ride. Whether it's in the bedroom or everywhere, it's still the same - which is why you can be chained to the doorway and still not be submitting. There is an irresistible force, a ceding of the will that I most associate with submissive, and that’s what you were missing there."

It’s more challenging when you look at not just a single scene, but a relationship as a whole and start wondering if you are really submitting or not. I suppose to even be wondering at all suggests that there is some strange dynamic afoot. Most would agree that one aspect of the Dominant/Submissive relationship is that the D/s aspect is overt, if nothing else. After all, isn’t that the point? Master Lucas, however, wasn’t the kind of Master who chose to dominate me outside of the bedroom. In my early years I described myself as a "Bedroom Submissive," and so you might also say that Lucas is a "Bedroom Dominant." I no longer describe myself that way, however, as I long to serve in other ways. In order to attend to this need in myself, I would do things that you might define as submissive, or you could just call them "being a good houseguest," being as I’m the type of guest who wants to be invited back. I usually took care of things like putting our scene toys away neatly or cleaning up after dinner.

My friend Stacey understands this in a very intuitive way, because she is deeply submissive both in a sexual way as well as my urge to be a geisha of sorts. She also recognizes that the Dominant’s role in taking her to the final depths of subspace is critical. She says, "There are two parts to my submissive self. During active submission (during play, even during intense non play moments), i feel like XenaSub. In a surrendered state i actually feel far stronger both physically and mentally, and there are times i swear i could break right though the chains. The first ninety percent of my surrender goes easily, but that last ten percent has to be taken. When that occurs, i feel raw, as if i'm inside out with no border left, no logical thought left." Stacey goes on to say that, "The second part of my submissive self is the geisha part. That is the woman who can bring the warm washcloth after sex or have an intelligent conversation on any topic. Then i feel softened. but fully logical. It's the illogical ceding of the will that makes me know they’re both from the same part of me."

I love how Stacey describes the second part of her submissive self, because it is that part that I yearn to express in my own life, and which I was unable to with Lucas. As I mentioned, I often took care of small things while at his home, and as he’s an appreciative guy, he did always thank me, but I never sensed that he was thanking me as a Submissive per se. And so I felt that there was no "receiver" for my submissive acts. If there is no receiver, then in a way, there is no submission either as I see it. I can’t really be submitting to nothing can I? An arguable point perhaps.

There was once when he asked me to take care of the dishes and I ended up not doing them because we both overslept, but he didn’t reprimand or punish me in any way. So essentially there was very little motivation for me to follow through. You might say that I should have been self motivated by wanting to please him, but I have to admit that my motivation to cuddle longer with him was a lot stronger being as I knew the dishes weren’t any big deal to him. When I asked him about that particular incident, he replied that he didn’t care much whether I did them or not and that he wasn’t "into punishment." As I mentioned, Master Lucas took an egalitarian approach with me and didn’t generally ask me to do things for him or change my behavior in any way. He felt that I was already doing all the things he would have liked, or would have asked me to do anyway. (Nice to know that I’m the perfect Submissive eh?) Master Lucas and I have discussed these issues at some length and he said, "To me, if I were to make up chores and directives for you just to have them would be drama, it wouldn’t be real dominance and submission. I don’t make up play commands. Rather, I believe in living my dominance as part of my life. So if I want something, I expect you to fulfill that want, without being asked and also without playing the games I see so many Submissives play in order to be ‘punished.’ I see that quite often in other couples and I find it utterly ridiculous."

To him, he was a Dominant whether or not he asked me to do or be anything – which may well be true – but to me as a Submissive, there is a basic structure to the D/s relationship that was completely absent. In fact, he agrees that his style is essentially an informal one, saying: "I run my household in a more casual manner, so therefore my style of dominance is also a more casual style. So it’s not going to look like the kind of activity that you see with other couples who have a formal structure to their relationship. It may be more relaxed looking, but it is no less meaningful and no less powerful." I respect Lucas’ perspective, and yet although he was perfectly happy with our easygoing day-to-day relationship, I feel that the foundation of dominance provides an explicit construct of some sort for the Submissive. It doesn’t have to be an uber structured Slave Girl of Gor type thing with me naked in chains and waiting on him hand and foot of course! But with no guidance on how to make him happy, my submissive needs went completely unfulfilled. I wanted direction, limits. I wanted to know how to please him in specific delineated ways, Without any of that, I saw our relationship as best buddies who played on weekends. This foundational difference is one of the things that eventually stalled our relationship.

Is Master Lucas wrong and myself right? Of course not. Master Lucas has the right to call himself anything he wants, and to dominate any way he wants to, because ultimately – that’s the right of a Dominant. And if there is anything that I believe, it’s that all approaches to BDSM are valid; all of them. I do want to also say here that Master Lucas and I also had many scenes where I did very much submit to him in other ways, but this column isn’t about those scenes. I wrote about this particular scene and our relationship in general because I wanted to address this particular conundrum. That said, I also believe that I need a different style of Dominant if I am to be happy as a Submissive. So, I’ll thank Master Lucas for his masterful use of ginger, not to mention other high fiber vegetables, and I’ll get on with looking for someone who is more of like mind to my particular style of submission and a rollicking good ride!


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

REFERENCES

Is it Really Submission? (if I like everything he does?)
By Screamer
NOTE – this is a very entertaining column by Screamer (aka Kanthra Adair) on this same subject from a different perspective.
http://www.sensuoussadie.com/articles/screamerisitsubmission.htm

Just Call me a Bedroom Submissive
By Sensuous Sadie
http://www.sensuoussadie.com/sadiescolumns/sub/justcallmeabedroomsub.htm 

Slave Girl of Gor, by John Norman
Part of the World of Gor series available on Amazon.com



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sensuous Sadie is the author of Spiritual Transformation through BDSM; Stories and Submissions from Fellow Travelers.
She is the founder and leader (1999 - 2001) of Rose & Thorn, Vermont's first BDSM group. Comments, compliments and complaints, as well as requests for reprinting can be addressed to her at SensuousSadie@aol.com or visit her website at http://www.sensuoussadie.com/. Sadie believes the universe is abundant, and that sharing information freely is part of this abundance, so she allows reprints of her writing in most venues.

Copyright 2009 Sadie Sez Publications