|
|
|

Hell Hath no Fury like a Submissive
Scorned
By Sensuous Sadie
sensuoussadie@aol.com
www.sensuoussadie.com
This is one of several
postscripts to my column series called "My Travels with
Griffin
." It's the story of my
relationship with
Griffin
, with a focus on our mutual
exploration of BDSM and spirituality. You don't have to read them in
order, but it might make more sense to do so. While
Griffin
probably does not like what I
wrote, he did have the opportunity to review it and make corrections.
The truth is, I want to shoot out his kneecaps. I want to smirk at him
writhing on the ground as I murmur, "Now you know how I have felt the
last three months." I could do it too; turns out that I'm a good shot
at a fifty-yard target, and likely a darned good one at three yards. I
won't of course, because I have good impulse control, but now I understand
why so many people shoot their spouses. Heartache can make you fantasize
about and even do some pretty extreme things. Instead of indulging my
shooting fantasy, I did a "David Letterman" and tossed his boom
box out my second floor window. I grinned as it crashed in a pile of
lopsided pieces. If I'd known how satisfying that would be I would have
destroyed his leftover junk months ago.
"He," of course, is my former Dominant Griffin. I've written a
number of columns following our yearlong love affair, but none of them
tell the story of his leaving in one place, so this is where I'm going to
try to do that.
Griffin and I celebrated our first anniversary at the 2003 holiday party
of Rose & Thorn, the group I founded here in Vermont. A couple of
months later I noticed that several areas of his life were unraveling: his
career, finances, and his ability to make decisions. Soon after I received
an e-mail telling me, in short, to get lost. Of course I knew these were
serious challenges, but I didn't realize there was any issue with me. He
refused to speak to me for nearly a month; "surgically removing me
from his life," as he put it. We had promised each other a hundred
times that we would always, always talk over any problem that came up so I
was in a state of shock, unable to comprehend what had happened.
Griffin told me at the end of that month that it wasn't that he
"couldn't" talk to me (which I could have forgiven), but rather
that he chose not to, and that's what broke me. I spent two months crying
myself to sleep every night and crying myself awake every morning. The
level of my grief has surprised even me, but then maybe not all that
surprising considering that I lost my Dominant, my lover, and my best
friend, all in one fell swoop. I wish that Griffin could know how much I
hurt; I imagine that if he knew, he'd at least acknowledge it which would
make all the difference. Even now I have deep periods of sadness,
wondering why he won't respond to my many questions. I think I would have
handled it better if he'd just talked to me, but being shut out just does
me in.
The Griffin I knew was a warm and loving man, nurturing and incredibly
good at communication. I wonder where that man went. Is he lost in some
fugue? Has he become a different person? Could it be that the wonderful
year we shared was really an aberration for him, and that this cold and
distant person is the real Griffin?
My friend and fellow author Justin Tanis went through an even more
horrendous experience with his partner. After nearly six years, his
Master cut off communication, refusing to return phone calls or make any
kind of contact. Justin had a ethical issue as well because he had
committed to being owned by this man, and he wasn't able to get his Master
to release him. Justin takes his slavery very seriously and didn't feel he
could just release himself. I found his situation similar to mine because
I too had made a promise not to abandon Griffin, and it became quite the
rock and the hard place because you can't really stand by someone (or be a
slave to them) when they won't even speak to you. After a while you start
to wonder if you're a fool, and maybe have been all along.
Justin explained that sometimes a mental illness or other situation makes
a dominant unqualified to be an owner of human property; not unlike
Captain Queeg in The Caine Mutiny. In a situation like this,
contracts and commitments cannot be kept because the dominant is simply
unable to fulfill his or her part of the bargain. The bottom cannot be
held accountable to a contract that the Top cannot uphold.
While it is true that I gave up standing by Griffin a few weeks ago, the
guilt still stands by me like a late evening shadow – long into the
night. I wonder what kind of partner I am to give up on someone who is in
trouble. I don't know that there are any real answers, except that I
cannot help him if he won't allow me to, and that it's clear that he is
not able to be a Dominant right now. Yes, Dominants too are human, all too
much so sometimes.
In the absence of information, I'm working on a number of grief reduction
strategies, the best of which is target shooting. This has the additional
visceral satisfaction of exploding clay pigeons. I also work out, do
breathing exercises, and listen to stress relaxation tapes. Relaxation
notwithstanding, last week I took a hammer to the beaded collar he had
made just for me. This was one of four collars Griffin gave me even though
he did not want to collar me, something which hurt me deeply. That's the
ultimate in ambivalence, the shifting sands that made up almost everything
about him. Despite this he has always maintained that he loves me, even
now. I can't help but wonder if that could be true when almost everything
else I knew about him turned out to be untrue, or at least only true for
the moment. Is love and rejection compatible? As much as I believed he
loved me and still does, I sometimes feel like I am simply fooling myself
considering how he left.
The only question left then is: What would I do differently next time? The
tough part is that I thought I'd done my due diligence with Griffin; after
all we waited six months before ever discussing love, commitment, or
collaring. In retrospect of course, I can see my mistake. I've always felt
that even if a relationship cannot be all you want it to be, you should
appreciate a person for the gifts they can give you. That's the positive
side of things. The other way to look at that is that I compartmentalized
away the parts of Griffin that didn't work for me. I figured since he
didn't live with me, it didn't matter much if his life was in chaos. Now I
understand that compartmentalizing doesn't work because all parts of a
person eventually come into play. While I was able to keep his problems at
arm's length for that year we were together, they would eventually affect
my life in the most profound of ways. I am also partially responsible
because I shut my eyes to the elephant in the livingroom, a strategy which
only postpones the moment of getting stomped on.
My friend Cynthia, who happens to be a mental health counselor herself,
says that in psychological circles my wanting to pop Griffin in the
kneecaps is considered to be a form of homicidal ideation. She adds that
this may make me at-risk to harm another person and that she
would assess my situation to figure out if I was actually likely to do it.
I countered that this is "assault," not "homicide."
After all, I don't want to kill him, just maim him a little. She's right
that I'm at-risk though, not for shooting anyone, but for losing my trust
in men. I'm not sure how I'll get that back. Still, as long as there's
something to drop out of a second floor window, there's always hope. And
it just so happens that I've got a few of Griffin's things put aside.
"If you haven't bought the shovel and bag you
haven't been in love. If you haven't practiced your alibi in front of a
mirror you haven't been in love. And if the only thing that stopped you
from killing this mother fucker was an episode of CSI then you've never
truly been in love."
~ Chris Rock

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Thank you to Justin for sharing his very personal
story, as well as helping me edit that section so it read in his voice.
Read the SCENEprofiles Interview with Justin
Tanis
The Caine Mutiny is by Herman Wouk and is available on
www.amazon.com
Bullseye courtesy of www.mytargets.com/
Sensuous Sadie is the author of It's Not About the
Whip: Love, Sex, and Spirituality in the BDSM Scene. Read an excerpt
at http://www.trafford.com/robots/03-0551.html
. She is the founder and
leader (1999 - 2001) of Rose & Thorn, Vermont's first BDSM group.
Comments, compliments and complaints, as well as requests for reprinting
can be addressed to her at SensuousSadie@aol.com
or visit her website at
www.sensuoussadie.com . Sadie believes the universe is abundant, and
that sharing information freely is part of this abundance, so she allows
reprints of her writing in most venues.
Copyright May, 2004 Sadie Sez Publications

|
|
|