SCENEprofiles Interview with
three Anonymous People in the BDSM Scene

 

 

 

 

 

NOTE FROM SADIE: This is a combined interview/discussion with Katie, Marco and TJ, several "disgruntled" scene players from around the country. Over the last few years I've heard a number of increasingly concerned voices about some of the things that are happening in the scene. Few of these people are willing to speak out, which is understandable because the people in their community would probably be hurt and angry. However, I felt that what they have to say is valid and should be heard, if only to stimulate conversation on where we are going as a community. I sent these questions to three people in the scene and asked them to reply freely and anonymously. All of them have years of experience in BDSM and have been active in the management of their community groups. Names have been changed. 


Sadie: First, can you tell me a little bit about your background in BDSM, and how you've been active so far.

Katie
: "I've been a submissive since my early 20s, let's just say over 20 years ago. I started out as a bottom, with an interest in the fun stuff, and the journey grew from there. Today, I'm not sure how to define it; it's the visceral parts I look for now. As far as community, I have a wonderful circle of friends throughout New England who are all involved in aspects of the larger D/s community, but we talk about books and music and work and gardens far more than about D/s. Let me clarify that my current journey is not really 'BDSM' related, but more involved in Dominance and surrender to that, with BDSM as an adjunct and tool, not a goal."

Marco: "I've known about my orientation since I was about 15, but didn't do anything about it until much later. That was back before the Internet and e-mail made research an easy and private matter. I was raised to believe that 'nice' people didn't do such things; BDSM was what gay bikers did. As for my activity, I attend local public and private events and I have a steady partner with whom I play regularly."

TJ: "My first experience was in college. At the time I didn't have a name for it, but, in retrospect, it was definitely BDSM. My girlfriend was house sitting for one of her professors and she invited me to join her for the weekend. She had a pair of handcuffs and asked me if she could use them on me. I was reluctant, but I said yes. She kept me cuffed for almost 2 days. She made me pee in a bottle and invited one of her girlfriends over to play. Even then I preferred to be in control, but it was exciting to me, at the age of 20, to be naked with two sassy girls. A little humiliation was a small price to pay.

"More recently I've had several partners who like to submit, mostly vanilla women who have feelings that they want to explore and are eager to add a new dimension to bedroom activities. I've also led a local BDSM group."

~~~~~<<>>~~~~~

Sadie: I used the word "disgruntled" in describing you as a member of the BDSM community, but that's a bit dramatic sounding as you are still involved in your community on several levels. Would a better term be disaffected?

Katie: "No, 'disgruntled' is good. I don't actually think there is a D/s 'community.' I have a lot of very good friends and people I respect throughout New England who are involved with D/s to different degrees and in different ways. I've become very disenchanted with groups that identify themselves as 'D/s' or 'BDSM' groups, solely with that focus. While there are some wonderful organizations involved in teaching and mentoring and expanding people's awareness, there are also some groups who simply use it as a cliquish excuse for kinky play. I've found that these latter groups are very oriented toward the 'rack em and whack em' form of BDSM, and are unaccepting, in fact intolerant, of those individuals who follow different paths in D/s, including domestic discipline, D/s without BDSM, adult age play, primal scenes, or any of the other variations that exist in the broader community.

"An example was a play party that was set where there was a required 'fetish' dress code. Those who said they preferred to scene in other than leathers, corsets or other fetish wear were told they could not attend. A Dominant who was going to lead his naked sub around on a leash all night while wearing street clothes was considered not 'fetish' enough to attend. This lack of intolerance in some groups is doubly sad, given the societal judgments already made."

Marco: "I think a more accurate word is 'disgusted.' However, disgruntled and disaffected work, too. But, on the one hand, I'm glad there's a community in which to express myself in a safe manner. But on the other hand, I find most of the people involved in BDSM have issues. Granted, we all have issues but here are some specific examples of people I have actually met (not just heard about).

  • A couple I know agree that without BDSM, they would not stick together.
  • I know several people in the scene who seem perpetually unemployed and yet somehow manage to find the resources necessary to make several weekend trips a month to play events, despite continuous complaints by them that 'money is tight'.
  • A man at a party told me about having arranged to have somebody 'offed.'
  • A man at a party told me about spending time in prison. I was deeply concerned since that particular party was in my home so I insisted on further research. Turns out, he was in prison for distributing child pornography and immediately got uninvited to the local group.


"As for the couple who would not stay together if BDSM were not a part of their lives, I realize I am being subjective when I think that is a skewed focus but what would happen if one of them fell ill or got injured to the point where play was no longer doable? Would they break up and then have the injured party feel abandoned? I feel a strong relationship needs more to its base than BDSM.

"Not to be judgmental, but I just feel that if you're dealing with unemployment or low employment issues, your time and money would be better spent trying to change that. Rather than spend money on toys and/or fetish clothes and events, why not learn a marketable skill or take a second job?

"These last two people are not people I am comfortable associating with and it's very discouraging when such persons show up at BDSM gatherings."

TJ: "Maybe. I guess I find it hard to feel respectful for some people I meet in the BDSM community. With submissives it is often a cloak for insecurity and neediness. And with Dominants it often appears to me to be little more than play-acting. Dominance and submission exist in the vanilla world too and, to me, it seems in many ways more honest, more complete and more worthy of respect. For example, A Dom in the BDSM world will take pride in owning and knowing how to use seven different kinds of floggers. A vanilla dominant uses his/her abilities to raise money for their church, coach little league, participate in political and civic affairs, etc. In vanilla life there is more of an emphasis on sharing. BDSM seems so relentlessly focused on sexual pleasure. It's often very selfish."

~~~~~<<>>~~~~~

Sadie: Does this disaffection also include your own practice of BDSM?

Katie: "Not at all, since mine isn't about public play or costuming – it's about intimate connection."

Marco: "No, but it limits my participation in public events and my willingness to participate in local BDSM groups."

~~~~~<<>>~~~~~

Sadie: There is BDSM as you practice it in your private life, and BDSM as in your connection and contribution to the community as a whole. Where are you in this continuum? For example, some people keep their play to the private sphere and some play mostly in public. Some people just show up at local events, some travel constantly, and some simply stay home.

Katie: "I don't see it as a continuum. Do I scene publicly? No. Does that mean that I'm not intense about what I do? Again, no. I enjoy being at D/s friendly parties and gatherings, because it's nice to be with people with whom you don't have to say 1,000 times 'No, submissive does not mean doormat.' I think it's a disservice, and in some ways judgmental, to suggest that there is a 'continuum' that involves private versus public play. They're just different paths, apples and oranges.

Marco: "I have a strong connection to the local community but I'm probably seen as private and reserved. I contribute where I can but I have to admit that I don't consider myself an expert in any of the BDSM 'skills.' I contribute with moral support and help in finding answers, when asked. As for my play, I play in private with my partner and in private (invitation only) parties. I am not comfortable with play that is open to the general population.

"I don't feel that public munches in a public place are that safe for expressing my BDSM side. Perhaps it's just what I'm used to, but I prefer a more closed group (where members are screened) in a private home to an 'open to whoever knows' group in a public (and very vanilla) setting where your coworkers or neighbors may be."

TJ: "Mostly it's private for me. I occasionally attend get-togethers in the local community, but, for the most part, I find them tiresome."

~~~~~<<>>~~~~~

Sadie: Over the last few years, you have made some observations about the scene, and the people in it. What did you observe, and how did you come to those conclusions?

Katie
: "There are wonderful people involved in D/s – smart people with full lives. I have difficulty with people who identify themselves solely by their D/s or BDSM orientation. Sure, it's an important part of our lives. But so are careers, music, family, communities, books, politics, friends. Yes, it's valuable to put time into making safe places for people to express their D/s or BDSM identities. But the people who identify themselves primarily by their sexual or D/s orientation are also often those who are living marginal lives in every other area. Life isn't solely about how long you can wear clover clamps.
It's about leadership in the community and your family, and how you're making your corner of the world a little better."

Marco: "I observed that a good number of people involved in the scene are troubled with issues in their private life. And many of them are narcissistic. I come to these conclusions subjectively, of course. I feel that a number of people put more of their life energy into BDSM than is healthfully balanced. I feel the same about the coworker who works 80 hours a week or the friend of my partner who is always doing something related to skiing. Where's the balance in these folk's lives?
 
"I also find that a number of people in the BDSM scene truly allow it (BDSM) to become their core identity. My partner and I enjoy BDSM and the thrills it provides but we are individuals, too, with family, a home, jobs, vanilla interests. BDSM is a part of who we are, both together and apart, not the core of who we are. 
 
"I'm just concerned that people use BDSM to maybe hide or create an identity because it's 'easy.' By easy, I mean the clothing and hard skills of flogger use, wax, bondage, etc. It's easy to look like you know what you're doing. The soft skills of empathy and knowing when enough is enough are more difficult to learn and grasp and many people can't see beyond the physical hard skills and appearance to understand what is happening during a scene. Not to mention that all the trappings of visual BDSM still will not make up for the fact they lack basic interpersonal skills such as conversing at a party. If somebody can't carry a basic conversation about the weather or the shrimp cocktail at the buffet, how can I expect them to understand my needs in scene negotiation, let alone during play."

TJ: "I guess the primary observation is that my participation in the community brings out the worst in me. I become selfish and arrogant. I think this is because the focus of BDSM is kind of a relentless pursuit of pleasure. It's not that I'm against pleasure, but I think that there are many ways of enjoying life that are not so centered on my you-know-what."

~~~~~<<>>~~~~~

Sadie: What would you like to change in your community as it stands now? What do you think would actually help things?

Katie: "In the Vermont community, I truly hope that there can be maturation to an acceptance of the different paths of D/s and BDSM. Many people come and go, and it would be valuable to ask those who have left the formal community why they left. While costume parties are fun, I think it would be valuable to have some events that look at different paths – domestic discipline, adult age play, primal scenes, etc.

Marco: "Not to sound elitist but I'd certainly appreciate seeing a higher caliber of participants at events. But, that's probably not feasible so I guess what I'd like to see is more demos at the monthly gatherings that focus on the 'soft' skills of BDSM, instead of constantly being bombarded with 'hard' skill demos."

TJ: "I don't have any desire to change it. It seems to suit the needs of the people who participate. I can find what I want elsewhere."

~~~~~<<>>~~~~~

Sadie: Do you think that your approach to BDSM and the community has changed, or do you believe there is a very real change happening out there?
 
Marco: "I think it's a simple as the saying, 'familiarity breeds contempt.'

~~~~~<<>>~~~~~

Sadie: What are the good things that you see in the community today? What are you looking forward to?

Katie
: "Throughout New England, which is the community I'm familiar with right now, I'm thrilled to see energy, exploration, and an acceptance, no, an embracing, of the different and wondrous paths people are exploring."
 
Marco: "The good things are there are a few stable people whom my partner and I have befriended. With these people, we are able to express our BDSM sides in safe and non-judgmental ways. Which is also true of the local 'munches.' As for what I am looking forward to? I always look forward to dressing fetish at a monthly munch."
 
Sadie: Is there anything else you'd like to add?
 
Marco: "Only that as subjective and judgmental as I may sound, when it comes down to it, I'm OK with how people choose to spend their time and money. I'm not going to argue with anybody about their choices, but if they ask me, I may say something they don't want to hear. But, I make my choices, too, and I choose to keep BDSM a part of my life, not the reason for my being.
 
"And, while I may feel some people allow BDSM to dominate (ha! no pun intended) their lives, I'm also thankful to some of those people for learning what they've learned and sharing it with us in the form of books and demonstrations at parties, conventions, etc. Every interest needs its obsessive types to make things better."

Sadie: Thank you all for sharing your thoughts with me!
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you enjoyed this interview, read more SCENEprofiles with BDSM personalities on Sadie's website at www.sensuoussadie.com


Sensuous Sadie is the author of It's Not About the Whip: Love, Sex, and Spirituality in the BDSM Scene. Read an excerpt at http://www.trafford.com/robots/03-0551.html. She is the founder and leader (1999 - 2001) of Rose & Thorn, Vermont's first BDSM group. Comments, compliments and complaints, as well as requests for reprinting can be addressed to her at SensuousSadie@aol.com or visit her website at www.sensuoussadie.com . Sadie believes the universe is abundant, and that sharing information freely is part of this abundance, so she allows reprints of her writing in most venues.

Copyright 2004 Sadie Sez Publications